There's always something historic about the season's first Battle of The Bay matchup. The concept alone would entertain even the nominal Bay Area fan.
It's a good thing that is so, because there wasn't much more to this game without the pre-existent rivalry. If I were the A's, I would be mildly upset at the lack of competition. The Giants started a weaker lineup, probably to test Uribe's ability to command his probable field of mostly secondaries (Kawa was the only certain starter). Uribe didn't do that all too well, causing Velez to throw to him too far from second base, once making an opposition single a double instead.
The SP was a certain Martinez that I had not really seen or heard of, and he lasted a whole 1 2/3 innings, giving up four. Taschner was wild, and Matos had to enter by the fourth inning--but when he did, it resulted in a DP. The A's, on the other hand, started an extremely notable prospect, Trevor Cahill. Cahill did well, except for a WP that allowed a run. Someone who did do well for us was Francis Beltran, who put the A's down in order for one BP inning.
As for offense, a few of the unknowns surprised me: Torres manufactured our first run by stretching a double, advancing well and then taking home on a WP. Jesus Guzman, a young 3B hit his second HR in as many games, which impresses well (he also made a nice tag to stop a triple). An intriguing note, though Jon spoke well by saying it's not much because we're in spring, is that the Giants have the most HRs in spring among NL teams. I will agree that it is obviously still spring; we had two on with two out in the 8th Inning, making it a chance to tie the game, and Bowker whiffed. However, even if it is just spring, things are assuredly looking up from last year, without question!
The most intriguing news from this game happens to be the roster releases: Yabu is now optioned along with another BPer, and Roberts is now officially released. The first piece doesn't surprise me, and makes me glad. The second piece doesn't exactly make me sad, but it does surprise me. Roberts had been doing well recently, even being willing to take the fifth spot for OF on the bench. Brian Sabean visited in the 4th inning voicing some unbelievable news: that the reasoning was primarily based in giving the youth more ABs. "Unbelievable" because my GM may see what I have noticed for so long. Sabean also noticed that he wasn't willing to see a certain pitcher in AAA "at his age". My only other guess to complement the Sabeanic mentality is that Roberts wasn't willing to be optioned, but his release raises a number of questions:
1) What will happen to the rest of his salary? Does it free it up to add to someone like Lewis, whom we obviously want to keep?
2) Who will take the 5th OF spot? Is Velez going to be an OF-only reserve, or do we want to keep an extra IF, maybe keeping both Frandsen and Burriss? Guzman?
3) What else will happen now that kind of precedent has been set? Are we finally willing to go with the numbers from last year, take a risk and do better with a very young team; rather than maintaing a guaranteed mediocre season? Could we in fact be back to form?
To be honest, I could see it coming when Vizquel was released and Aurilia was "invited" to spring training via a minor league contract. But this was a shock; a good one both for purpose and stats, but a shock. Sabean seems to really like Velez, as well. What next? Perhaps you want to start only the best team players instead of paying $126m for a "third starter"? Hallelujah!
One thing now is not a shock: There's nothing like clarity in the front office, even if it's a prima facie reasoning for the time being. That kind of news will do, to occupy the mind during a day off tomorrow.
FINAL
OAK - 4
S.F. - 2
The Boys Who Showed Up: Torres, Guzman, Sabean
Showing posts with label Brian Sabean. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Brian Sabean. Show all posts
Thursday, March 5, 2009
Monday, August 4, 2008
Making Sabean Look Stupid - Again
If you've been reading this blog for very long, or following the team along with us other die-hards, you know the name Nate Schierholtz. You also know how he's one of the best we have that is NOT playing because of a veteran blockade in RF known as Randy Winn. I like Randy, but Nate doesn't even have to play RF, and Winn needs days off. Don't bother to mention Roberts.
Well, guess what? Nathan showed the world how much he deserves to play yesterday, in hitting a grandslam to energize the U.S. Olympic team to a 9-1 thrash of Canada. Don't knock Canada, either. They're not so bad internationally; certainly not so bad as to equate a 9-1 loss to a 2-0 loss anywhere else.
Keep rockin' it, Nate. We know where you belong.
For some reason, the Cake song "Nugget" keeps playing in my head when I think of B.S.; yeah, particularly the first verse.
-MSH
Well, guess what? Nathan showed the world how much he deserves to play yesterday, in hitting a grandslam to energize the U.S. Olympic team to a 9-1 thrash of Canada. Don't knock Canada, either. They're not so bad internationally; certainly not so bad as to equate a 9-1 loss to a 2-0 loss anywhere else.
Keep rockin' it, Nate. We know where you belong.
For some reason, the Cake song "Nugget" keeps playing in my head when I think of B.S.; yeah, particularly the first verse.
-MSH
Friday, August 1, 2008
The B.S. Show
Brian Sabean was on KNBR this last afternoon.
Ralph spent the first part talking about the Manny trade. Then, other trades; I actually found myself surprised that I agreed with him about the Pudge trade to the Yankees.
He also spent time on what the Giants didn't do for trades, and tried to get Sabean to explain why nothing happened after Durham. It didn't work. Ralph was nice; B.S. was slow, vague, deep in tone, vague, trailing off, and vague. In other words, it turns out that in a severe revelation of cosmic appropriation, the man's initials do in fact make sense. Hint: specifics help us trust you, Brian.
But that wasn't the best part: Not only did he say that the veterans "have done a good job for us so far as what they've brought to the club", he also followed that with "but now we've got to shift gears and figure out who hits where and when" and admitted that "everyone knows what's been happening with us". Hello, sir? SHIFT GEARS? It's past the trading deadline for God's sake. You should have been "shifting gears" after Spring Training. Thank God he said the youth will finally be playing in the middle-infield. But where was that mentality when we were already 13 games out? Sad. Just sad.
He's not irrational, but I don't feel any better.
-MSH
Ralph spent the first part talking about the Manny trade. Then, other trades; I actually found myself surprised that I agreed with him about the Pudge trade to the Yankees.
He also spent time on what the Giants didn't do for trades, and tried to get Sabean to explain why nothing happened after Durham. It didn't work. Ralph was nice; B.S. was slow, vague, deep in tone, vague, trailing off, and vague. In other words, it turns out that in a severe revelation of cosmic appropriation, the man's initials do in fact make sense. Hint: specifics help us trust you, Brian.
But that wasn't the best part: Not only did he say that the veterans "have done a good job for us so far as what they've brought to the club", he also followed that with "but now we've got to shift gears and figure out who hits where and when" and admitted that "everyone knows what's been happening with us". Hello, sir? SHIFT GEARS? It's past the trading deadline for God's sake. You should have been "shifting gears" after Spring Training. Thank God he said the youth will finally be playing in the middle-infield. But where was that mentality when we were already 13 games out? Sad. Just sad.
He's not irrational, but I don't feel any better.
-MSH
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)